This score puts the new MacBook Pro with M1 Max chip on par with the now-discontinued iMac Pro, which had a model equipped with the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 GPU. Even compared to the best GPU available for the previous model (which is AMD Radeon Pro 5600M), M1 Max still has 62% more powerful graphics. The laptop has just passed the Geekbench certification and it reveals some impressive results. When compared to the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M, which is the GPU found in the base model of the previous 16-inch MacBook Pro with Intel processor, the M1 Max chip has 181% faster graphics, as the AMD 5300M scores only 24461 in Geekbench 5. The Apple MacBook Pro M1 Max comes with a 16-inch display and has the new M1 Max chipset. According to the website, the score comes from the high-end version of the M1 Max chip with 64GB of RAM. An early benchmark already revealed that the M1 Max CPU delivers twice the performance of the M1 chip, and now a Metal score from Geekbench 5 shows that the M1 Max offers up to 181% faster graphics than the GPUs found in the previous 16-inch MacBook Pro.Īnother benchmark test run with the new MacBook Pro recently uploaded to the Geekbench website shows that the GPU of the M1 Max chip scored 68870 in the Geekbench 5 Metal test. It seems these cores really just scale linearly for the most part.Apple this week unveiled the new 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro, which are powered by Apple Silicon M1 Pro and M1 Max chips. I'm thinking this math might actually hold up, at least for estimates that are plus/minus a few hundred points on geekbench. Plugging in my 1290/580 numbers, we would estimate it's geekbench score to be around 4900. The apple A15 chip in the iPhone 13 has 2 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores.
GEEKBENCH MAC M1 MAX UPGRADE
Obviously this is not actually a truly scientific estimate, I have no idea how linearly this actually scales, but if we assume that my estimate is reasonable, I think it's pretty significant because it seems to show the 8-core M1 pro being quite a bit closer in performance to the M1 than it is to the 10-core M1 pro, which means if you're someone who would make use of that performance, it's probably worth it to spring the extra $200 for the upgrade to the 10-core.ĮDIT: Y'all, I might be on to something. So, assuming the 8-core version of the M1 pro has 6 performance cores and 2 efficiency cores, we can estimate that it would score roughly 8900 on the multicore geekbench benchmark.
So now we know each performance core adds about 1290 to the multicore geekbench score, while each efficiency core adds about 580. We can now plug those into both equations to make sure we did the math right, and looks like we did. Then we plug that back into the second equation and solve for e which gives us e = 583. Then we plug that into the first equation and solve for p, which gives us p = 1291. The more powerful 10-core M1 Max with 32GB of memory was allegedly the variant used, though as with all leaked benchmark results, dont take anything as gospel just yet. We can solve for e in either equation (I chose the second), which gives us e = 5750 - 4p. Ugly camera notch aside, both of the latest MacBook Pro devices equipped with the M1 Max feel like the first Apple laptop to really appeal to its intended market for. We'll have p = performance core and e = efficiency core
So, we can set up a system of equations to estimate how much each type of core contributes to the overall score. We also know that the M1 pro/max has 8 high performance cores and 2 efficiency cores, and gets a multicore geekbench score of around 11500 So, we know that the M1 has 4 high performance cores and 4 efficiency cores, and gets a multicore geekbench score of around 7500 I was bored and I felt like dusting off the ol' algebra shelf in my brain, so I figured I'd do my best napkin math attempt at "scientifically" estimating this lol.
0 kommentar(er)
